USPTO serial 78023396
CASEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CASEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Research Triangle Park, NC
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
PHILADELPHIA, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maury M. Tepper, III
MAURY M TEPPER III WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICEPOST OFFICE BOX 831RALEIGH, NC 27602-0831UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | health care analysis services, namely, providing employers and managed care organizations information on health care costs associated with asthma and on cost savings associated with treatments for asthma, by using actuarial models to estimate direct medical costs and lost productivity costs due to asthma; analysis services, namely, providing employers and managed care organizations information on health care costs associated with asthma and on cost savings associated with treatments for asthma, by using actuarial models to estimate direct medical costs and lost productivity costs due to asthma | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | health care consultation services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |