USPTO serial 78023445
ARLEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ARLEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mooroolbark, Victoria, AU
Mooroolbark, Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Colleen C. Butler
COLLEEN C BUTLER BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE455 N CITYFRONT PLZ DR STE 3600CHICAGO, IL 60611UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal hardware products for doors and windows, namely, metal locks, metal keys and key cylinders, metal latches, metal hinges, metal knobs, metal bolts, metal escutcheon plates; metal fasteners, namely screws, bolts, nuts, and nails; and door hardware, namely, metal handles and doorknockers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 4, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |