USPTO serial 78023533
.BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with .BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND ON-LINE, NAMELY, CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEB PAGES, WEB SITES, AND ELECTRONIC COMMERCE WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR OBTAINING INFORMATION ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING DATABASES FEATURING GENERAL AND LOCAL NEWS, AND INFORMATION OF INTEREST TO SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC AREA; REGISTRATION OF DOMAIN NAMES, AND ADDRESSES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF USERS ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER SITE DESIGN; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; DATA CONVERSION OF COMPUTER PROGRAM DATA OR INFORMATION | ACTIVE | Feb 13, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |