Drawing for DAYWALKER

USPTO serial 78024160

DAYWALKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DAYWALKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL J. HUGHES

HICKMAN COLEMAN & HUGHES LLP HICKMAN COLEMAN & HUGHES LLPP O BOX 52037PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038SERVICES OF A VIRTUAL AMUSEMENT ARCADE ON THE INTERNET; PROVIDING RTRIEVAL SERVICES OF LIVE BROADCASTINGS VIA A HOMEPAGE ON THE INTERNET (WEB CAM); DATA TRANSMISSION SERVICES BETWEEN NETWORKED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; OPERATING A CHAT BOX AND A PIN BOARD FOR DISPLAYING INDIVIDUAL MESSAGES ON THE INTERNET, USENET OR ANOTHER ONLINE SERVICE; PROVIDING DIRECTORY SERVICES ON THE INTERNET, IN PARTICULAR AN INTERNET LOCATOR SERVER (ILS); PROVIDING A DISCUSSION FORUM ON THE INTERNET OR THE USENET; SERVICES OF A VIRTUAL AMUSEMENT ARCADE ON THE INTERNET; PROVIDING RTRIEVAL SERVICES OF LIVE BROADCASTINGS VIA A HOMEPAGE ON THE INTERNET (WEB CAM); DATA TRANSMISSION SERVICES BETWEEN NETWORKED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; OPERATING A CHAT BOX AND A PIN BOARD FOR DISPLAYING INDIVIDUAL MESSAGES ON THE INTERNET, USENET OR ANOTHER ONLINE SERVICE; PROVIDING DIRECTORY SERVICES ON THE INTERNET, IN PARTICULAR AN INTERNET LOCATOR SERVER (ILS); PROVIDING A DISCUSSION FORUM ON THE INTERNET OR THE USENETACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance