USPTO serial 78024224
PDML
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PDML?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Franciso, CA
San Franciso, CA
Product Data Integration Technologies, Inc.
Long Beach, CA
Other trademarks owned by Product Data Integration Technologies, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin R. Greenstein
MARTIN R GREENSTEIN55 S MARKET ST FL 16SAN JOSE, CA 95113-2324UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER AND SOFTWARE CONSULTATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, ANALYZING, RESEARCHING, DESIGNING AND DEVELOPING COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND PROVIDING DATA MIGRATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS TO ALLOW INTEROPERABILITY BETWEEN COMPATIBLE AND NON-COMPATIBLE SYSTEMS AND PROGRAMS; PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN RELATION TO COMPUTERS, COMPUTER SOFTWARE, DATABASES AND DATABASE MANAGEMENT, NETWORKING, PROGRAMMING AND APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT, AND IN THE FIELD OF INTEROPERABILITY BETWEEN COMPATIBLE AND NON-COMPATIBLE SYSTEMS AND PROGRAMS; DESIGN AND CONSULTING SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY DEVELOPING AND PROVIDING SOFTWARE TOOLS AND UTILITIES AND DATA CONVERSION SERVICES TO ALLOW FOR THE EXCHANGE, CONVERSION, INTEGRATION AND TRANSFORMATION OF DATA AND DATABASES OF OTHERS; DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING SOFTWARE PROGRAMS FOR PROVIDING LOGICAL INTEROPERABILITY AMONG AND/OR BETWEEN COMPATIBLE AND/OR NON-COMPATIBLE SYSTEMS, FORMATS, STANDARDS, APPLICATIONS AND DATABASES AND TO PROVIDE INTEROPERABILITY BETWEEN AND INTEGRATION OF LEGACY SYSTEMS WITH E-APPLICATION PACKAGES, ENTERPRISE-WIDE INTEROPERABILITY OF ALL APPLICATIONS AND OF ALL DATA SOURCES AND DATABASES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Modulant Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Modulant Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Product Data Integration Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PDML
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |