Drawing for SMOOTHIE ELITE

USPTO serial 78024754

SMOOTHIE ELITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2972567Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 19, 2005
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with SMOOTHIE ELITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew J. Himich

Matthew J. Himich Thompson Coburn LLPOne US Bank PlazaSaint Louis, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric food blenders for domestic useSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMar 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 12, 2025ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 26, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 28, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 14, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 9, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 21, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 31, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 25, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 25, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 11, 2011NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 11, 2011C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 11, 2011APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jul 1, 2011E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 18, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 12, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 12, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 19, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 19, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 19, 2005REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2005CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 21, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 21, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 21, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 2, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 18, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jan 8, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 30, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 20, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 14, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance