USPTO serial 78024889
WE THE PEOPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WE THE PEOPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ROBERT M. CHAVEZ
ROBERT M CHAVEZ3618 BARRINGTONSAN ANTONIO, TX 78217UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Computer educational services, namely, complication, dissemination and publication of text on computer hard disk drives through a global computer network, providing real-time online capabilities for on-line voter registration, ballot network; ballot design services for others, balloting processing; managing online political voting and election process for others, converting paper ballots into electronic format for others and managing the absentee ballot process for others, managing online political voting for others, conducting electronic communication for compiling and disseminating information classes, seminars, conferences and workshops in the fields of law, politics, current events, community activities Applicant is distributing course materials in connection with the exercise of United States constitutional rights; publication of books, magazines | ACTIVE | Dec 12, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 27, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |