USPTO serial 78025338
EPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTERS, SHANNA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Murray Hill, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerard S. Doyle, Jr.
GERARD S DOYLE JR THE LAW OFFICE OF DOYLE & DOYLE636 MORRIS TPKESHORT HILLS, NJ 07078UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Internet based suite of related products and services to manage and operate seaport terminals and related operations The ePORT products and services are to be used by terminal operators, truckers, port authorities and port operators, intermodal operators and companies involved in port and cargo operations The ePORT products and services manage or produce equipment inventory (containers, chassis, trailers and support equipment); dispatch and receiving (loaded and empty) operations; reports of operations; billing support and planning The ePORT products and services link the various port-related operating companies to the ePORT management system and its various users | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |