USPTO serial 78025578
PROTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KAY LYN SCWARTZ
KAY LYN SCWARTZ GUARDERE WYNNE SEWELL LLP1601 ELM ST STE 3000DALLAS, TX 75201-4757UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Spectacles (optics); ophthalmic lenses; spectacle lenses, including plastics lenses, mineral lenses, corrective lenses, progressive lenses, sunglass lenses, polarized lenses, tinted lenses, light-sensitive lenses, photochromic lenses, treated lenses, coated lenses, anti-reflective lenses, semi-finished lenses; spectacle lens blanks; semi-finished spectacle lens blanks; contact lenses; spectacle frames; cases for all the aforesaid goods; computer software for screening computer users' vision, for providing advice on ergonomics at the workstation and presenting solutions in terms of visual correction and comfort; computer software and computer software packages for ordering of goods and services relating to ophthalmic optics, in particular spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses and treatments or coatings therefor; prerecorded magnetic and/or optical and/or electronic media featuring catalogues and price lists of goods and services relating to ophthalmic optics; calculation software for customizing spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses; computer software for controlling and/or monitoring machines for working, machining, treating and/or coating spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses; computer software for checking spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses, including treated and/or coated lenses, and their coatings | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | ophthalmic optics, in particular spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses and treatments or coatings therefor; prerecorded magnetic and/or optical and/or electronic media featuring catalogues and price lists of goods and services relating to ophthalmic optics; calculation software for customizing spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses; computer software for controlling and/or monitoring machines for working, machining, treating and/or coating spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses; computer software for checking spectacle lenses and ophthalmic lenses, including treated and/or coated lenses, and their coatings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |