Drawing for GUARDIAN NETWORK

USPTO serial 78025726

GUARDIAN NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GUARDIAN NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

EDWARD R. COURTNEY

EDWARD R COURTNEY LAW DEPT840 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55114UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE FOR IN TRANSMITTING INFORMATION BETWEEN EQUIPMENT AT A REMOTE LOCATION AND A COMPUTER AT A SECOND LOCATION IN ORDER TO MONITOR AND MAINTAIN THE CLEANING AND SANITIZING OPERATIONS FOR THE INSTITUTIONAL AND INDUSTRIAL MARKETSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 30, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 25, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 9, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 28, 2002RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 26, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance