USPTO serial 78026975
CONDOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CONDOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Aimee Merriman Nolan
AIMEE MERRIMAN NOLAN WW GRAINGER100 GRAINGER PKWYLAKE FOREST, IL 60045-5201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | eye protection, namely, goggles, glasses, eye and face shields; eye protection accessories, namely, safety cords, eyewear cases, and eyewear dispensers; head protection, namely, hard hats and winter liners; hearing protection, namely, ear plugs not for medical use and ear muffs; respiratory protection, namely, respirators other than for artificial respiration, respirator masks and filters for respirators; hand protection, namely, gloves for industrial use; protective clothing, namely, coveralls, shoe and boot covers, aprons, bouffant caps, hairnets, beard restraints, lab coats, pants, shirts, and pull over hoods | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | ergonomic wearables, namely, gloves, glove liners, wrist supports, ankle wraps, back supports, knee supports, all for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | head protection, namely, sweatbands; protective rainwear, namely, rainsuits, jackets, poncho, overalls, hoods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |