USPTO serial 78027943
UPX-CARRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UPX-CARRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Shrewsbury, NJ
Shrewsbury, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VICTOR F. SOUTO
VICTOR F SOUTO HALE AND DORR LLP650 COLLEGE RD EPRINCETON, NJ 08540UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for provisioning Internet Protocol based services, namely, virtual private networks, quality of service, multi-protocol label switching, Internet security, firewalls, digital name services, web hosting, e-mail, Internet connectivity, and file transfer protocol | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 2000 |
| 042 | providing technical and customer support services, namely troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems, software upgrade support, and customization of software, in connection with computer software for provisioning Internet protocol based services, namely, virtual private networks, quality of service, multi-protocol label switching, internet security, firewalls, digital name services, web hosting, e-mail, internet connectivity, and file transfer protocol | ABANDONED | Aug 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |