USPTO serial 78028723
DIAMOND HARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2870695Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 2004
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DIAMOND HARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. DAY,
Christopher J. Day Law Office of Christopher Day9977 North 90th Street, Suite 155Scottsdale, AZ 85258UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | MACHINE PARTS NAMELY, SAW BLADES, POWER DRILL BITS, ROTARY BRUSHES FOR MACHINE, POWER WHEELS, POWER OPERATED GRINDING POINTS, POWER OPERATED MACHINE SHARPENERS, FILES FOR POWER MACHINES, POWER OPERATED RASPS, ELECTRIC SANDER, BELTS FOR CONVEYERS, JOINER BLADES FOR SAWS; AND SHARPENING STONES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Planet Diamond Tools (Bermuda) Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Planet Diamond Tools (Bermuda) Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by PLANET DIAMOND TOOLS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named DIAMOND HARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 30, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 2, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |