USPTO serial 78028735
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen T. Falk
STEPHEN T FALK ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY100 INDEPENDENCE MALL WPHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-2399UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals and chemical reagents, namely ligands, genetic vectors, genetic hosts, genetic biochemicals, genetic bioengineering reagents and protein receptors for use in regulating cellular functions in transgenic plants, fungi and animals, and in cells of plants, fungi and animals; cells of transgenic animals, transgenic plants and transgenic fungi, and cells of animals, plants and fungi for use in medical, pharmaceutical and veterinary laboratory research | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical and veterinary preparations for use in regulating cellular functions of plants, bacteria, animals, transgenic plants, transgenic bacteria and transgenic animals; cells of transgenic animals, plants and fungi, and transgenic bacteria, for medical and clinical use; horticultural and agricultural preparations, namely regulated producers of biotherapeutic proteins, industrial raw materials, polymeric materials and high-value proteinatious products, fungicides, insecticides, herbicides and pesticides | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Live transgenic plants, live transgenic animals and fungi | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |