USPTO serial 78029232
SHARPREFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RODRIGUEZ, JOHN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SHARPREFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Portland, OR
Portland, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JACKIE D'ANGELO
JACQUELINE M D'ANGELO SALU INC11344 COLOMA RD STE 605GOLD RIVER, CA 95670UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Corporate website advertising and marketing, namely, offering an online forum for business partnerships in the area of medicine for buyers and sellers and potential business partners to trade, exchange information about their products or services, and to facilitate the identification of business partners, physicians, and equipment and services, in the area of medicine, medical goods/services including professional and patient solutions; organizing trade shows in the medical field including preparation of trade show booths, corporate giveaways, promotional brochures, corporate stationery and posters | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Corporate website design; corporate website consultation and development of websites for physician specialists, and providing physician specialists online, non-downloadable software development tools to establish and maintain a practice website including the design of email and medical messaging features; developing corporate websites and computer consultation in the nature of offering technical assistance relating to the development of corporate websites that allow access to goods and services of business partners via the Internet; hosting corporate websites | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |