USPTO serial 78029322
CHICAGO'S THIRD AIRPORT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHICAGO'S THIRD AIRPORT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CYNTHIA B. STEVENS, ESQ.
CYNTHIA B STEVENS ESQ WILDMAN HARROLD ALLEN & DIXON225 W WACKER DR STE 3000CHICAGO, IL 60606-1229UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | AIRPORT PASSENGER CHECK-IN SERVICES, MANAGEMENT OF AIRPORT OPERATIONS, PASSENGER TRANSPORTATION AND SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 31, 1995 |
| 037 | AIRCRAFT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES | ABANDONED | Jul 31, 1995 |
| 039 | AIRPORT SERVICES FOR PASSENGERS, AIR CARRIERS AND AIRCRAFT OPERATORS, NAMELY, TRANSPORTATION OF AIRCRAFT BY MEANS OF TRUCKS, AIRCRAFT STORAGE, AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL OF LANDING AND TAKE-OFF | ABANDONED | Jul 31, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Milwaukee County
- Other trademarks owned by Milwaukee County
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Similar marks named CHICAGO'S THIRD AIRPORT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |