Drawing for HARDCORE

USPTO serial 78029802

HARDCORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, APRIL LUEDERS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARDCORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DONALD S. GRIER

DONALD S GRIER LAW OFFICE OF DONALD S GRIER4310 OAK GLEN STCALABASAS, CA 91302-1978UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for connecting, accessing, and integrating corporate local networks and global computer networks to handheld computers; telephone answering machines; magnetically encoded pre-paid telephone calling cards; telephone receivers; telephone equipment, namely, caller identification boxes; cellular telephones and telephonesACTIVE—
038Cellular telephone services, telephone communication services, electronic transmission of messages and data, electronic voice messaging, namely the recording, storage and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone, rental of telecommunications equipment, PBX dialing services, paging services, electronic data interchange services and electronic mail servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2004MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 23, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 9, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 18, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 31, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 31, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 16, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance