USPTO serial 78030287
AUTHENTIC PILATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, KARLA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTHENTIC PILATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANDREW L. SPENCE
ANDREW L SPENCE PILATES INC75 LAFAYETTE AVESUFFERN, NY 10901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | PROVIDING FOR OTHERS, TRAINING IN, LESSONS, SEMINARS, AND WORKSHOPS ON PHYSICAL CONDITIONING; PHYSICAL FITNESS INSTRUCTION; TRAINING IN THE USE AND OPERATION OF EXERCISE EQUIPMENT AND THE FACILITIES THERETO CONDUCT THE AFOREMENTIONED SERVICES | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |