Drawing for VISUALIZING IDEAS THREE-FIVE MICRODISPLAYS

USPTO serial 78030622

VISUALIZING IDEAS THREE-FIVE MICRODISPLAYS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VISUALIZING IDEAS THREE-FIVE MICRODISPLAYS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stacie K. Smith

STACIE K SMITH FENNEMORE CRAIG PC3003 N CENTRAL AVESTE 2600PHOENIX, AZ 85012-2913

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009LIQUID CRYSTALS DISPLAYS FOR USE IN HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 10, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 20, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 20, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 7, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 29, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 15, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 13, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 20, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 25, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance