USPTO serial 78030842
LATEX PLEASURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DINALLO, KEVIN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LATEX PLEASURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stanley M. Chernoff
STANLEY M CHERNOFF11960 BORDEN AVESAN FERNANDO, CA 91341-9010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Electric and non-electric massage devices and accessories for massaging or vibrating portions of the face and body; imitation sexual organs, namely, penises, penises and testicles, vaginas and breasts; devices for aiding in sexual intercourse and masturbation, namely, reproductions of parts of the male and female, life-sized anatomically correct mannequins; stimulation devices for aiding in sexual arousal and sexual performance; vibrators and vibrator sleeves, constrictor rings for use to maintain erections; and vacuum pumps and accessories, namely, a cylinder, sleeve, cushion inserts, constrictor rings and constrictor ring loaders for use to maintain penile rigidity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |