USPTO serial 78031192
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
I. Morley Drucker
ANTHONY M KEATS KEATS MCFARLAND & WILSON LLP9720 WILSHIRE BLVD PENTHOUSE STEBEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Perfume, cosmetics, namely, compacts, eye pencils, eye cream, eye makeup, eye makeup remover, eye shadow, eyebrow pencils, eyeliners, face power, facial scrubs, foundation makeup, face cream, non-medicated lip balm, lip gloss, lipstick, facial lotion, body lotion, facial makeup, mascara, skin moisturizer, night cream, cosmetic pencils, nail polish, face powder, body powder, bath powder, hair shampoo, shower gel, skin clarifiers, skin cleansing cream, skin cleansing lotion, skin emollients, skin soap, sun block preparations, sun screen preparations, suntanning preparations, wrinkle removing skin care preparations | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 6, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |