USPTO serial 78031399
PERSONALIZED VISION CARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2917879Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2005
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERSONALIZED VISION CARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
D-69123 Heidelberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
D-69123 Heidelberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
D-69123 Heidelberg, DE
Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
HEIDELBERG, DE
Other trademarks owned by 20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
HEIDELBERG, DE
Other trademarks owned by 20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
HEIDELBERG, DE
MUENCHEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Neil K. Nydegger
NEIL K NYDEGGER NYDEGGER & ASSOCIATES348 OLIVE STSAN DIEGO, CA 92103-6216UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Ophthalmological devices, namely, laser systems comprised of laser sources, optical components, computer evaluators and hardware for displaying optical images, for collecting data to evaluate the anatomy and optical properties of an eye | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 Perfect Vision Optische Geraete GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 PERFECT VISION OPERATIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by 20/10 PERFECT VISION AG
- Other trademarks owned by TECHNOLAS PERFECT VISION GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named PERSONALIZED VISION CARE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 17, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 2, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 25, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |