Drawing for PROGARD

USPTO serial 78031423

PROGARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KOVALSKY, LAURA G
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROGARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gary S. Kessler

GARY S KESSLER SHERRYKESSLER & COLLINS, PC5950 SHERRY LN STE 222DALLAS, TX 75225-6536

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemical compound used to protect seeds and plants from damage by certain chemical herbicidesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 4, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 19, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 31, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 3, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 3, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 16, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 29, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 1, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 1, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 4, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 12, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 23, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance