USPTO serial 78031545
TEXIZE TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TEXIZE TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS Q. HENRY
THOMAS Q HENRY BANK ONE CTR TWRWOODARD EMHARDT NAUGHTON MORIARTY ET AL111 MONUMENT CIR STE 3700INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-5137Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | full line of computer products, namely, games, multimedia software, educational computer programs, and reference product programs, all in the field of education including learning and training techniques, and all stored on electronic media in the nature of CD-ROM and computer disks, and distributed electronically for businesses, home, the government, and developers; desktop information management computer programs providing electronic mail, personal calendar, group scheduling, personal information management, task management, browsing and sharing of information and documents; computer database management programs for managing, viewing, and editing files and documents; computer program for management of electronic mail messaging and private communications software for enabling network and global computer network communications; computer database programs for meeting and event scheduling, managing group calendars, task delegation, programs for reporting, recording notes, transferring data to and from databases and to and from computer programs and computer files; computer database programs, namely, address book programs, telephone dialing programs, programs for correcting typographical and capitalization errors, programs for tallying voting responses and testing scores; computer programs, namely, operating system programs for handwriting and symbol recognition programs, utility management programs for use with desktop, portable, handheld and wearable electronic devices; computers, namely, desktop and laptop computers; computer peripherals, namely, keyboards, monitors, computer mouses and trackballs, storage devices, namely magnetic tape drives and disk drives, recording devices, namely tape recorders in the nature of digital audio and video tape recorders, and CD-ROM writers, video cards, and sound cards | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Packaging Consulting Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Packaging Consulting Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TEXIZE TECHNOLOGY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |