Drawing for BABY BLOOPERS

USPTO serial 78032155

BABY BLOOPERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BABY BLOOPERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lee B. Beitchman

LEE B BEITCHMAN BEITCHMAN & HUDSONP O BOX 7929ATLANTA, GA 30357-0929UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded videotapes, audio cassettes, compact discs, and digital video discs all featuring educational materials for the purpose of improving the creative and intellectual faculties of infants and childrenACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 8, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 8, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 8, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 5, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 31, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 28, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 23, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 9, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 16, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance