USPTO serial 78032295
TECHNOLOGY THAT CARES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TECHNOLOGY THAT CARES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Asmus
SCOTT J ASMUS MAINE & ASMUSP O BOX 3445NASHUA, NH 03061-3445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | monitoring, locating, tracking, and data exchange hardware and software, namely wireless transceivers and computer electronics, namely, power supplies, microcontroller/microprocessor, memory device, biosensors, and envirosensors, using global positioning satellite technology and any other ground station telecommunication technology for locating, monitoring, tracking and exchanging data with persons, property, animals, vehicles, vessels, and other mobile assets; computer hardware and software using global positioning satellite technology and any other ground station telecommunication technology for telemetry, locating, monitoring, tracking and exchanging data with persons, property, animals, vehicles, vessels, and any other mobile assets, comprising wireless transceivers and computer electronics, and for transmitting global positioning system data and other information to a central processing center with hardware and software for interpreting and processing information received from the transceiver for mapping, configuring, monitoring, and managing mobile assets, property, persons, vehicles, vessels and animals | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2005 |
| 010 | Physiological monitoring devices and sensor devices and related communications hardware and software for use in measuring physiological parameters, namely collecting, storing, transmitting, recording, and presenting medical data and patient data, all sold as a unit | ACTIVE | Feb 10, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Applied Digital Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Applied Digital Solutions, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named TECHNOLOGY THAT CARES
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |