Drawing for POCKET ROUTEBOOK

USPTO serial 78032503

POCKET ROUTEBOOK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2637776Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 15, 2002
Examiner
COWARD, KATHRYN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POCKET ROUTEBOOK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SHAWN J SEFRET

SHAWN J SEFRET ROSENBERG MARTIN FUNK GREENBERG LLP25 S CHARLES ST STE 2115BALTIMORE, MD 21201-3305UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software application which assists in the collection of various data sets and the processing of customer orders in wholesale product distributionSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJun 8, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 23, 2004C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Jun 22, 2004AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Oct 15, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jul 30, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 2, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 28, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance