USPTO serial 78032642
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer firmware and software, namely computer firmware and software for use in issuing and processing credit, debit and smart card payment; electrical and electronic apparatus and instruments for the transmission, reception, analysis, monitoring, processing, input, output, storage, retrieval, display and printout of sounds, images and data namely, radio transmitters, satellites, antennas, electric current controllers and transformers, electric cables, wires, plugs, assembly connectors, electrical connections for data processing; data processing apparatus and instruments, namely computer hardware; telecommunications apparatus and instruments namely, telephones, facsimile machines; component parts therefor for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | DATA PROCESSING; BUSINESS APPRAISALS; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTING; BUSINESS ORGANIZATION CONSULTING; BUSINESS RESEARCH; COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE; DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS AND TELECOMMUNICATION APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Maintaining and updating computer firmware and software for others; computer programming for others; design for others of computer software, hardware, firmware and data processing and telecommunications equipment; consulting services and research in the field of computer software, firmware, hardware and data processing and telecommunications apparatus and instruments; installation and maintenance of computer software and firmware; rental of computer hardware, software, firmware and data processing equipment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |