USPTO serial 78032922
HEMATROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEMATROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maury M. Tepper, III (M. Christopher Bolen, Kathryn M. Eyster, Anne C. Fleeson, Jack B. Hicks, Jeanene L. Jobst, Sarah Anne Keefe, Fang Liu, Jeffrey R. McFadden, C. Robert Rhodes, Randel S. Springer, Maury M. Tepper, III, Mitchell A. Tuchman)
MAURY M TEPPER III M CHRISTOPHER BOL WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCPO BOX 831RALEIGH, NC 27602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS NAMELY STEROIDS FOR THE TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC THROMBOCYTOGENIC PURPURA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 13, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 30, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |