USPTO serial 78032928
COLIREST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLIREST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maury M. Tepper, III (M. Christopher Bolen, Kathryn M. Eyster, Anne C. Fleeson, Jack B. Hicks, Jeanene L. Jobst, Sarah Anne Keefe, Fang Liu, Jeffrey R. McFadden, C. Robert Rhodes, Randel S. Springer, Maury M. Tepper, III, Mitchell A. Tuchman)
MAURY M TEPPER III M CHRISTOPHER BOL WOMBLE CARLYLE SANDRIDGE & RICE PLLCPO BOX 831RALEIGH, NC 27602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, STEROIDS FOR TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES INCLUDING CROHN'S DISEASE AND ULCERATIVE COLITIS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 16, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 11, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |