USPTO serial 78032969
CYBERCHECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, KARLA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBERCHECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial services, namely, credit card services, loan financing, mortgage lending and mortgage brokerage services; banking services; bill payment services; pre-.payment services for subsequent purchases of goods and services; providing debit accounts for online payments; on-line financial services, namely, credit card services, loan financing, mortgage lending and mortgage brokerage services; on-line banking services; on-line bill payment services; credit card transaction processing; debit card transaction processing, virtual credit card processing; collection services, collection of cash and equivalent payments at brick-and-mortar locations to establish or recharge an account for on-line transactions; pre-payment services for the purchase of telecommunication services; ecommerce prepayment and post-payment services | ACTIVE | Jul 29, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |