USPTO serial 78033573
ORPHAN LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 20, 2004
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ORPHAN LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Children of Promise International
Centerville, OH
Children of Promise International
Alma, MO
Children of Promise International
Alma, MO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas H. Van Hoozer
THOMAS H. VAN HOOZER Hovey Williams LLP10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 100084 Corporate WoodsOverland Park, KS 66210Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fundraising, namely, providing financial assistance for orphans, widows and needy children; facilitating and arranging functional relationships between organizations and orphans, widows and needy children to provide financial support | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 6, 2002 |
| 042 | Charitable services, namely, providing food to the needy; and providing nutrition counseling | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 6, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Children of Promise International
- Other trademarks owned by Children of Promise International
- Other trademarks owned by Children of Promise International
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ORPHAN LINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 12, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 17, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |