USPTO serial 78033719
RSWEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RSWEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR WEB SITE DEVELOPMENT THAT ENABLES THE USER TO AUTOMATICALLY RETRIEVE WEB CONTENT FROM A PREDETERMINED SET OF URLS (SOURCE CONTENT) AND TO AUTOMATICALLY INCORPORATE THAT SOURCE CONTENT INTO A NEW WEB SITE (TARGET CONTENT) WHICH IS AUTOMATED THROUGH THE USE OF A PREDETERMINED SET OF RULES TO DEFINE THE MODIFICATION FROM SOURCE CONTENT TO THE TARGET CONTENT FOR USE IN ELECTRONIC COMMERCE THAT MAY BE DOWNLOADED FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 5, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |