USPTO serial 78034295
DENOVIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DENOVIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna M. Weinstein, Esq.
DONNA M WEINSTEIN ESQ FOLEY, HOAG & ELIOT LLP1 POST OFFICE SQBOSTON, MA 02109-2106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ENTERPRISE-SCALE TRANSACTION PROCESSING SOFTWARE WITH ASSOCIATED SOFTWARE CREATION AND EDITING TOOLS FOR THE REAL-TIME PROCESSING OF HIGH VOLUME, INFORMATION-RICH TRANSACTIONS GOVERNED BY CONTRACTS AND RULES THAT HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO A NATURAL LANGUAGE-LIKE CODE THAT CAN BE DIRECTLY INTERPRETED BY THE TRANSACTION PROCESSING SOFTWARE WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF CURRENT AND HISTORICAL DATA AS MAINTAINED IN A REAL AND NEAR-REAL TIME DATA WAREHOUSE | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | PROVIDING COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES TO BUSINESS CUSTOMERS BASED ON USING ENTERPRISE-SCALE TRANSACTION PROCESSING SOFTWARE AND ITS ASSOCIATED SOFTWARE CREATION AND EDITING TOOLS FOR THE REAL-TIME PROCESSING OF HIGH VOLUME, INFORMATION-RICH TRANSACTIONS GOVERNED BY CONTRACTS AND RULES THAT HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO A NATURAL LANGUAGE-LIKE CODE THAT CAN BE DIRECTLY INTERPRETED BY THE TRANSACTION PROCESSING SOFTWARE WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF CURRENT AND HISTORICAL DATA AS MAINTAINED IN A REAL AND NEAR-REAL TIME DATA WAREHOUSE | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | PROVIDING COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES TO HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN ADMINISTRATORS AND INSURERS, THEIR CUSTOMERS, THEIR PROVIDERS AND THEIR HEALTH PLAN MEMBERS, NAMELY, THE CREATION AND AUTOMATED ADMINISTRATION OF HEALTHCARE INSURANCE BENEFIT PLANS, PROVIDER CONTRACTS, MEMBER CONTRACTS, AND RELATED TERMS AND RULES THAT HAVE BEEN CONVERTED TO A NATURAL LANGUAGE-LIKE CODE THROUGH THE USE OF CREATION AND EDITING SOFTWARE TOOLS; PROVIDING AUTOMATED, REAL-TIME TRANSACTION PROCESSING OF HIGH VOLUME, INFORMATION-RICH TRANSACTIONS SUCH AS INSURANCE CLAIMS, ENCOUNTERS, BENEFIT PLAN QUERY-RESPONSES, MEDICAL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSACTIONS SUCH AS REFERRALS AND AUTHORIZATIONS, AND OTHER RELATED HEALTH INSURANCE ADMINISTRATIVE TRANSACTION TASKS; PROVIDING ACCESS TO AND ALLOWING ON-LINE, REAL-TIME, AND NEAR-REAL-TIME ABILITY TO REVIEW, INPUT, REVISE, AND VERIFY DATA AND CREATE REPORTS ON THE CURRENT AND HISTORICAL DATA AS MAINTAINED IN A REAL AND NEAR-REAL-TIME DATA WAREHOUSE BY THIS SAME SOFTWARE SYSTEM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by eHealthDirect, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by eHealthDirect, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DENOVIS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named DENOVIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 7, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |