USPTO serial 78034383
PEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
B-3001 Leuven, BE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Asmus
SCOTT J ASMUS MAINE & ASMUSP O BOX 3445NASHUA, NH 03061-3445UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Digital telecommunication services for computer integrated manufacturing (CIM), namely providing transfer of data by telecommunications; Digital telecommunication services, namely telecommunications consultation | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2005 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |