Drawing for FOOD FOR THOUGHT

USPTO serial 78034744

FOOD FOR THOUGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOOD FOR THOUGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert D. Mercurio

ROBERT D MERCURIO WINDELS MARX LN & MITTENDORF, LLP156 W 56TH STNEW YORK, NY 10019-3800UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016LUNCH BAGSACTIVEMay 10, 2002
021Lunch boxes and lunch kits consisting primarily of thermal insulated containers for food or beveragesACTIVEMay 10, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 24, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2002SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 24, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 25, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 18, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance