USPTO serial 78034904
TRY ME BUY ME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRY ME BUY ME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jay H. Geller
JAY H GELLER JAY H GELLER, A PROF CORPTWR2425 OLYMPIC BLVDSANTA MONICA, CA 90404-4030Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Electric and non-electric massage devices for massaging or vibrating portions of the face and body; imitation sexual organs, namely penises, penises and testicles, dildoes, vaginas and breasts; devices for aiding in sexual intercourse and masturbation, namely reproductions of the male and female anatomy and lifesized anatomically correct mannequins; stimulation devices for aiding in sexual arousal and sexual performance; vibrators and vibrator sleeves; constrictor rings for use to maintain penile rigidity; and vacuum pumps and vacuum pump accessories, namely, a cyliner, sleeve, cushion inserts, constriction rings and constriction ring loaders for use to maintain penile rigidity | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |