USPTO serial 78035023
STEEL24-7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2801612Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2003
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with STEEL24-7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Puteaux, FR
Puteaux, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward M. Prince
ALSTON & BIRD LLP601 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WN BLDG 11TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS ADVICE AND BUSINESS INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF STEELS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS; PREPARING AND DISSEMINATING ADVERTISING MATERIALS IN THE FIELD OF STEELS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS; CONDUCTING MARKET STUDIES IN THE FIELD OF STEELS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS; MARKET RESEARCH IN THE FIELD OF STEELS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS; PROMOTING THE SERVICES OF THE STEEL INDUSTRY THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED AND AUDIO PROMOTIONAL MATERIALS AND BY RENDERING SALES PROMOTION ADVICE; COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND ADVICE RENDERED TOWARDS THE MANAGEMENT THEREFOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC MAIL SERVICES; ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED MESSAGES AND IMAGES IN THE FIELD OF STEELS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS; AND ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO STEELS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS BY TELEMATIC MEANS ACCESSIBLE BY ACCESS CODE OR TERMINALS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE FEATURING TECHNICAL INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF STEELS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS; RENDERING TECHNICAL ADVICE FOR IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF PRODUCTS AND SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF STEELS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS; RENDERING EXPERT TECHNICAL VALUATIONS AND ENGINEERING WORK IN THE FIELD OF STEELS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS; AND RENDERING TECHNICAL ADVICE CONCERNING THE CHOICE AND USE OF STEELS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 28, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |