USPTO serial 78035583
LIQUID MUSIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 30, 2005
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LIQUID MUSIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Redwood City, CA
Redwood City, CA
REDWOOD CITY, CA
REDWOOD CITY, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
REBER M. BOULT
REBER M BOULT STOKES BARTHOLOMEW EVANS & PETREE PA424 CHURCH ST STE 2800NASHVILLE, TN 37219UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of music, audio, data, graphics and video; entertainment services, namely, broadcasting, multicasting, and unicasting of musical, audio, data, graphics, video and multimedia data and entertainment programing via electronic communication networks | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Liquid Audio, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Liquid Audio, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GENEVA MEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks owned by GENEVA MEDIA LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named LIQUID MUSIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 6, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 30, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |