USPTO serial 78035822
THE TECHNOLOGY BEHIND THE VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE TECHNOLOGY BEHIND THE VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
San Rafael, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business, management, information planning, and consulting solutions services, including enterprise resource planning services, product management services, retail and merchandising support services, interactive merchandising services, namely, digital imaging tools and services, and tools and services for use in the collection, tracking and management of consumer merchandise data; as well as licensing of interactive merchandising technologies, all used internally and offered to third parties such as retailers, wholesalers and manufacturers | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2000 |
| 042 | Computer and technology consulting services, namely,designing and developing interactive presentations, designing, creating and maintaining web sites internally and for third parties, electronic commerce, information management, and business application management services, providing network deployment and network management services, providing hardware and software technical support services and custom computer software design, and systems integration services, all utilized internally or offered to third parties, including retailers, wholesalers and manufacturers | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |