USPTO serial 78036044
MYOSTATIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MYOSTATIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERYL N. STEPHENSON
SHERYL N STEPHENSON SHAPIRO SHER & GUINOT36 S CHARLES ST STE 2000BALTIMORE, MD 21201-3147UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparation for use in the regulation of skeletal muscle growth for in cattle, swine, poultry, fish and other marine animals and companion and domestic animals | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |