Drawing for DAYLIGHT

USPTO serial 78036173

DAYLIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAYLIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009MAGNIFIERS, HAND-HELD MAGNIFYING LENSES, DESK MOUNTED MAGNIFYING LENSESACTIVEFeb 1, 1999
011LIGHT BULB, MAGNIFYING LAMPS, TASK LAMPS, TABLE and DESK LAMPS, FLOOR LAMPSACTIVEFeb 1, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 8, 2003PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Mar 31, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 23, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 9, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance