Drawing for INLIGHT

USPTO serial 78036201

INLIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOYNER, CHARLES G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INLIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matt W. Carson

MATT W CARSON BAKER HUGHES INCORPORATED9100 EMMOTT RDHOUSTON, TX 77040-3514UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009WELL CONTROL APPARATUS FOR DOWN HOLE OIL, GAS OR INJECTION WELLS, NAMELY; DOWN HOLE COMPUTERIZED ELECTRICAL, AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLLERS, ELECTROMECHANICAL, ELECTRO HYDRAULIC AND OPTO-HYDRAULIC CONTROL FOR USE IN CONTROLLING THE FLUID FLOW IN AN OIL, GAS, OR INJECTION WELL; PRODUCTION WELL PRESSURE, TEMPERATURE, FLOW, AND CHEMICAL SENSORS; FIXED DOWN HOLE FORMATION EVALUATION SENSORS; ELECTRICAL INFLATION AND DEFLATION CONTROLLERS, NAMELY; VALVES TO OPERATE INFLATABLE PACKERS; REMOTE CONTROLLED AUTOMATIC METAL FLUID AND GAS FLOW CONTROL VALVES; REMOTE CONTROLLED VARIABLE AUTOMATIC CHOKE AND SHUT OFF VALVES; AUTOMATIC SAFETY VALVES; COMPUTER MONITORS FOR MEASURING VALVES PRESSURE; ELECTRICAL AND HYDRAULIC CONTROLLERS FOR FLUID FLOW CONTROL OF DOWN HOLE OIL, GAS AND INJECTION WELLS; AND ELECTRICAL AND HYDRAULIC POWER SUPPLIERS FOR FLUID FLOW CONTROL OF DOWN HOLE OIL, GAS AND INJECTION WELLSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 19, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 30, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 30, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 30, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 5, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 16, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance