USPTO serial 78037202
ROLLER COLA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2738861Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 15, 2003
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROLLER COLA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buffalo Grove, IL
Buffalo Grove, IL
Buffalo Grove, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAMES MICHAEL FAIER
Summer N. Katz AMT Group LLC8001 Lincoln AvenueSuite 201Skokie, IL 60077Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Carbonated beverages | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Nov 15, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 23, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |