USPTO serial 78037946
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Delray Beach, FL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID L. SIGALOW
DAVID L SIGALOW ESQ255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401P O BOX 3791ORLANDO, FL 32802-3791| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | a man-made, wastewater treatment process using a system of bioponic reactors and other components to produce high quality effluent in an aesthetically attractive environment | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |