Drawing for ACCA

USPTO serial 78038770

ACCA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACCA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth Chan

KENNETH CHAN RM 3C532AVAYA INC211 MOUNT AIRY RDBASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS FOR TRAINING IN THE FIELD OF VOICE NETWORKING, DATA NETWORKING AND PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS INCLUDED THEREWITHACTIVE—
041EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING SEMINARS, COURSES AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF VOICE NETWORKING, DATA NETWORKING AND THE USE OF RELATED VOICE NETWORKING AND DATA NETWORKING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND PRINTED COURSE PREPARATION MATERIALS INCLUDED THEREWITHACTIVE—
042PROVIDING TESTING TO DETERMINE PROFESSIONAL SKILLS ACQUIRED IN THE FIELD OF VOICE NETWORKING, DATA NETWORKING AND THE USE OF RELATED VOICE NETWORKING AND DATA NETWORKING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS AND PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS INCLUDED THEREWITHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 13, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 18, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 18, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 6, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance