USPTO serial 78039016
HES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Henderson, NV
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic Design Automation (EDA) product for hardware assisted simulation of VHDL and Verilog hardware description language (HDL) designs. The product will co-simulate designs with software on event-by-event basis with RTL simulators. The hardware supports Windows, UNIX and Linux operating platforms based on a PCI interface. | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2003 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |