USPTO serial 78039075
SYMBIOTRONICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LOUGHRAN, BARBARA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SYMBIOTRONICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments, namely, x-ray diffraction and x-ray fluorescence materials analyzers, manual and automatic equipment for the preparation of materials samples for laboratory analysis, namely, grinding mills, fusion and ignition units, presses; nautical apparatus and instruments, namely, marine satellite navigational systems, namely, global positioning systems; surveying apparatus and instruments, namely, satellite navigational systems, namely, global positioning systems; electric apparatus and instruments, namely, electric hair curlers and hot brushes, electric hair curling irons, electric irons, steam irons, electric cables, coaxial cables. electric light dimmers and switches, electric light track and trunking, electrical controllers, electric luminaries, pc cameras, fiber optics; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, laser scanners, optical scanners, optical inspection apparatus for industrial use; measuring apparatus and instruments, namely, opto-acoustic, photoluminescence and ellipsometric metrology instruments for industrial use, calibrators, digital thermometers not for medical use; signaling apparatus and instruments, namely, cathode ray tubes, x-ray tubes for industrial use, signal processors, video and tv signal generators, digital event recorders; checking apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic testing equipment, namely, oscilloscopes, time frequency and phase counters, resistance capacitance inductance meters, function generators, pulse generators, power supplies, probes, clamps and clamp meters, multimeters, megohmeters, electrical testers, voltage variation event recorders; lifesaving apparatus and instruments, namely, emergency warning lights; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images, namely, video cameras and lenses, digital cameras, video recorders, namely, video cassette recorders, video cd recorders, dvd recorders, digital video recorders, video monitors, telephone apparatus, namely intercoms, multiplexers, loudspeakers, sound amplifiers, pre-amplifiers, audio mixers, microphones, radio transmitters, radio receivers, antennas, television sets, tv-video combinations, namely combination tv-video sets, dvd machines, cd players, cd writers, sound cards, stereo receivers, stereo tuners, stereo audio systems, namely stereos, audio cassette recorders, headphones, portable listening devices, namely, mp3 players, personal stereos and radios, remote controls for radios, televisions, stereos, audio tape recorders, video cassette recorders, dvd machines, cd players, cd recorders and antennas, projectors, namely, liquid crystal display projectors, photographic projectors, video projectors, dictating machines, fax machines, cordless telephones, cellular telephones. digital transmission systems, namely, encryption generators, encoders, scramblers, multiplexers, magnetic coded cards, smart cards, set-top boxes, digital receivers, namely, audio, video, data, video wall systems, namely, automated event controllers and sequencers, video display screens, led display screens, recording discs, namely, blank cds and dvds | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 10, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |