USPTO serial 78039446
MARC ECKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MARC ECKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South River, NJ
South River, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
W. Mack Webner
W MACK WEBNER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Fragrances and toiletries, namely, perfume, bath gel, bath oil, bath powder and bath salts, soaps, body deodorants, essential oils; cosmetics, namely, creams, lotions, gels and powder for the face, body and hands, sun care preparations, make-up preparations; shampoos, gels, sprays, mousses and balms for hair styling and hair care and hair care preparations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 11, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 23, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |