USPTO serial 78039936
IMPERIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 2, 2008
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with IMPERIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Victoria Friedman
Victoria Friedman Dennemeyer & Associates, LLC2 North Riverside Plaza, Suite 1500Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | MULTI-PLY PANELS OF PLASTIC; PACKING, STOPPING AND ISOLATING MATERIALS, FLEXIBLE TUBES NOT OF METAL | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | MULTI-PLY PANELS OF PLASTIC, WOOD, AND THE COMBINATION OF PLASTIC AND WOOD FOR THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY, BUILDING MATERIALS NOT OF METAL; BUILDING PANELS NOT OF METAL; POURED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION FORMS, PANELS FOR THE BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY, PANELS AND CHANNELS TO FORM WALLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING OF SPECIALISTS IN POURED CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEVA Schalungs-Systeme GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by MEVA Schalungs-Systeme GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by MEVA Schalungs-Systeme GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named IMPERIAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2018 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 19, 2018 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 17, 2018 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2018 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 18, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 30, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 30, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 9, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 2, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |